Differences between revisions 1 and 13 (spanning 12 versions)
Revision 1 as of 2010-01-07 18:44:49
Size: 1348
Editor: anderson-camtasia
Comment:
Revision 13 as of 2010-01-28 16:34:18
Size: 2317
Editor: anderson-camtasia
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
= Archaeology Database Development Meeting Notes =  = Archaeology Database Development Meeting Notes =

----
Line 18: Line 20:
1. Pottery Bucket Reading Information is not on one of the forms and will be different from what we have on MPP documentation.
1. We discussed how to record elevations for pottery buckets separate from daily elevations for the locus. After discussion, Michael indicated that we did not need to collect intermediate elevations for the bucket. In the future this may change though.
1. Noticed that "Location" should really be replaced by "Point Number" on several point (MPP->New designation).
 1. Pottery Bucket Reading Information is not on one of the forms and will be different from what we have on MPP documentation.
 1. We discussed how to record elevations for pottery buckets separate from daily elevations for the locus. After discussion, Michael indicated that we did not need to collect intermediate elevations for the bucket. In the future this may change though.
 1. Noticed that "Location" should really be replaced by "Point Number" on several sections (This is an MPP change for new type of point collection).
Line 22: Line 24:
We discussed some issues about the PhotoApplicationSpecifications - see the notes on that page. We discussed some issues about the ArchaeologyProject/PhotoApplicationSpecifications - see the notes on that page.
Line 24: Line 26:
The designation in the identification section should be a drop down that equates to what the locus actually "is". These are equivalent symbols in the levels section. Therefore the dropdown in the levels should be taken from here. This will be an item on the ProgramChangeRequests page. The designation in the identification section should be a drop down that equates to what the locus actually "is". These are equivalent symbols in the levels section of MPP. Therefore the dropdown in the levels should be taken from here. This will be an item on the ArchaeologyProject/ProgramChangeRequests page.
Line 28: Line 30:
Justo: Will get me information for the pottery reading fields and the type by which the pottery is classified.  * Justo: Will get me information for the pottery reading fields and the type by which the pottery is classified.
 * Michael: Will email me information on the final cost of the summer internship.
Line 30: Line 33:
----
Line 31: Line 35:
== Jan 21 ==
Line 32: Line 37:
Present: Scot Anderson, Justo Morales

Topics Discussed:

 * Reviewed Architectural Locus Form Milestone
 * Pottery Reading Information Form.

=== Notes ===

We looked at the Architectural form that was completed for this meeting. No changes were requested at this time.

We reviewed discussion of "Location" attribute information on several parts of the form. For pails specifically we reiterated a decision earlier to remove it from consideration. Where specific location information is needed, a point identifier will be entered in location.

We had an extensive discussion of what we need to record during the pottery readings. Results of that discussion can be found at [Pottery]. This discussion took up the bulk of our time in the meeting.

----

Archaeology Database Development Meeting Notes


Jan 7, 2010

Present: Scot Anderson, Michael Hasel, Justo Morales

Topics Discussed:

Topics Reviewed: Work on database up to this point

  • Datamodel
  • Site/field information
  • Time investment
  • Earth Locus

Notes:

  1. Pottery Bucket Reading Information is not on one of the forms and will be different from what we have on MPP documentation.
  2. We discussed how to record elevations for pottery buckets separate from daily elevations for the locus. After discussion, Michael indicated that we did not need to collect intermediate elevations for the bucket. In the future this may change though.
  3. Noticed that "Location" should really be replaced by "Point Number" on several sections (This is an MPP change for new type of point collection).

We discussed some issues about the ArchaeologyProject/PhotoApplicationSpecifications - see the notes on that page.

The designation in the identification section should be a drop down that equates to what the locus actually "is". These are equivalent symbols in the levels section of MPP. Therefore the dropdown in the levels should be taken from here. This will be an item on the ArchaeologyProject/ProgramChangeRequests page.

Customer Todo Items

  • Justo: Will get me information for the pottery reading fields and the type by which the pottery is classified.
  • Michael: Will email me information on the final cost of the summer internship.


Jan 21

Present: Scot Anderson, Justo Morales

Topics Discussed:

  • Reviewed Architectural Locus Form Milestone
  • Pottery Reading Information Form.

Notes

We looked at the Architectural form that was completed for this meeting. No changes were requested at this time.

We reviewed discussion of "Location" attribute information on several parts of the form. For pails specifically we reiterated a decision earlier to remove it from consideration. Where specific location information is needed, a point identifier will be entered in location.

We had an extensive discussion of what we need to record during the pottery readings. Results of that discussion can be found at [Pottery]. This discussion took up the bulk of our time in the meeting.


ArchaeologyProject/MeetingNotes (last edited 2010-02-04 18:48:11 by anderson-camtasia)